THE TECHNOLOGICAL MODELS OF THE UNITED STATES AND CHINA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57033/xrmvhf10Keywords:
technological model, United States, China, technological sovereignty, semiconductors, sanctions, IT sector, rare earth elements, technological competitionAbstract
The article provides a comparative analysis of the technological models of the United States and China. It examines the historical background of China’s technological rise, which was stimulated by American policy in the 1980s and 1990s, and the present-day rivalry between Washington and Beijing for the status of technological superpower. The strengths and weaknesses of each model are identified: for the United States, the completeness of the technological cycle and the location of control centres on its own territory, set against growing dependence on developing states, bureaucratised financing and the excessive politicisation of technology policy; for China, the priority of volume combined with a rising emphasis on quality and cheap labour, set against dependence on imported energy resources and non-ferrous metals. The study concludes that both models share a high degree of dependence on raw materials and a common drive towards the sovereignisation of national technology markets.
References
1. Danilin, I. V. (2020). The American–Chinese technological war: risks and opportunities for the PRC and the global technology sector. Comparative Politics Russia, 11(4), pp. 160–176.
2. He, L. (2020). Advantages of the Chinese model after 70 years of development. Economic Review, no. 3, pp. 44–51.
3. Lebedeva, M. M. (2018). World Politics: a textbook for bachelor’s students. Moscow. 480 p.
4. Luzyanin, S. G. (2023). Chinese–American relations after the victory of D. Trump: assessments, approaches, prospects. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, no. 8, pp. 97–107.
5. Ostrovskiy, A. V. (2020). China in the world economy. Problems of the Far East, no. 4, pp. 6–23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdulaziz Abdujabborov (##default.groups.name.author##)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All contributions published in the SGELC proceedings are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Authors retain copyright and grant the conference the right of first publication. Readers are free to share and adapt the material for any purpose, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors and the original publication.
