The Attitude Of The Qadiyanis Towards Muslims
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-4-0302Keywords:
Qadiyanism, Ahmadiyya, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, takfir, the study by/4.0/) of sects, Qadian, claim to prophethood, hypocrisyAbstract
This article analyses, from a historical and religious-studies perspective, the spread of the Qadiyani sect, which emerged in India in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and was founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in the village of Qadian in the Punjab province, as well as the attitude of Qadiyanism (Ahmadiyya) towards Muslims, towards the unity of the Muslim Received: 10-05-2026 community and towards the sacred values of Islam. After briefly outlining the personality, origin and stages of the claims of the founder of the sect, the article Accepted: 28-05-2026 presents evidence drawn from primary sources – in particular from works by him Published:09-06-2026 and by his sons Mahmud Ahmad and Bashir Ahmad, such as “Haqiqat al-wahy”, “Arba‘in” and “Malfuzat Ahmadiyya” – in order to demonstrate the Qadiyani practice of declaring other Muslims unbelievers, of regarding prayer behind non- Qadiyani imams as impermissible, and of pursuing a strict policy of separation in matters of marriage, funeral prayers and social relations. Using the method Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. of source-critical analysis, the article relies primarily on the internal literature Submitted for open access publication of the sect itself, together with the works “Qadiyaniyya: Study and Analysis” by under the terms and conditions of the Ihsan Ilahi Zahir and “A Community Alien to Islam” by Abdumalik To‘ychiboyev. Creative Commons Attribution As a result, it is substantiated that, although the Qadiyani movement operates (CC BY) license outwardly under the guise of Islam, in practice it constitutes an independent (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ religious community radically separated from the Muslim ummah.References
1. Abdulaziz Mansur (2021). The Holy Qur’an: Translation of Its Meanings and Commentary. Tashkent: Sano-standart. (in Uzbek).
2. Fığlalı, E. R. (2001). Kadiyanilik. Istanbul: Turkish Religious Foundation Encyclopaedia of Islam. (in Turkish). 119 E-ISSN:3070-8370 Journal of Social and Theological Studies
3. Ghulam Ahmad (2010). Haqiqat al-wahy. Islamabad: Shirkat al-Islamiyya.
4. Ihsan Ilahi Zahir (2007). Al-Qadiyaniyya: dirasa wa tahlil. Cairo: Dar Ibn Hazm. (in Arabic)
5. Imam al-Tirmidhi (2022). Sunan al-Tirmidhi. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risala.
6. Karimov, Abdumannan (2011). The Historical Roots and Contemporary Forms of Religious Fanaticism. Tashkent: Movarounnahr.
7. Manzur (2023). Malfuzat Ahmadiyya. London: Shirkat al-Islamiyya.
8. Mirza Ghulam (2010). Arba‘in. Islamabad: Mu’assasat al-Jam‘ al-Ahmadiyya.
9. Muhammad Ahmad Dahman (1990). Mu‘jam al-alfaz al-tarikhiyya fi al-‘asr al-mamluki. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
10. Gafurova, I. (2020). Role of waqf properties in the history of Turkestan. The Light of Islam, 2020(3), 66-74.
11. Tuychiboyev, Abdumalik (2010). A Community Alien to Islam. Tashkent: Publishing and Printing Association of Tashkent Islamic University. 120 E-ISSN:3070-8370
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdulbosit LUQMONJONOV (##default.groups.name.author##)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.