Research Methods In The Psychology Of Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-4-0292Keywords:
psychology of religion, research methods, questionnaire, (CC BY) license psychometrics, experiment, qualitative research, mixed methods, cultural (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ adaptation. by/4.0/)Abstract
The article provides an analytical overview of the research methods used in the psychology of religion. It traces the evolution of methodology from Received: 10-05-2026 the questionnaires and personal documents of the discipline’s founders to modern psychometric, experimental, qualitative, neuroscientific, and mixed-methods Accepted: 28-05-2026 designs. The principle of the exclusion of the transcendent is discussed as the Published:09-06-2026 methodological foundation of the field. Particular attention is given to widely used measurement instruments, such as the Religious Orientation Scale, the Centrality of Religiosity Scale, the Duke University Religion Index, and measures of religious coping, as well as to the problem of their cultural adaptation for Muslim populations. The strengths and limitations of each group of methods Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. are compared, and ethical issues specific to research on religious beliefs are Submitted for open access publication examined. The author concludes that methodological pluralism and cultural under the terms and conditions of the sensitivity are necessary conditions for the development of the psychology of religion in Uzbekistan. Creative Commons AttributionReferences
1. Abu-Raiya, H., Pargament, K. I., Mahoney, A., & Stein, C. (2008). A psychological measure of Islamic religiousness: Development and evidence for reliability and validity. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18(4), 291–315.
2. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.
3. Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social- psychological perspective. Oxford University Press.
4. Belzen, J. A. (2010). Towards cultural psychology of religion: Principles, approaches, applications. Springer.
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 60 E-ISSN:3070-8370 Vol. 1, (Issue 4/2026)
6. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
7. Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100–108.
8. Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Rand McNally.
9. Hill, P. C. (2005). Measurement in the psychology of religion and spirituality: Current status and evaluation. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 43–61). Guilford Press.
10. Hill, P. C., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (Eds.). (1999). Measures of religiosity. Religious Education Press.
11. Hood, R. W., Jr., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
12. Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724.
13. James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. Longmans, Green, and Co.
14. Koenig, H. G., & Büssing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemiological studies. Religions, 1(1), 78–85.
15. Newberg, A., d’Aquili, E., & Rause, V. (2001). Why God won’t go away: Brain science and the biology of belief. Ballantine Books.
16. Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–543.
17. Pargament, K., Feuille, M., & Burdzy, D. (2011). The Brief RCOPE: Current psychometric status of a short measure of religious coping. Religions, 2(1), 51–76.
18. Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.
19. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications.
20. Starbuck, E. D. (1899). The psychology of religion: An empirical study of the growth of religious consciousness. Walter Scott.
21. Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. 61 E-ISSN:3070-8370
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aziza SAIDOVA (##default.groups.name.author##)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
