Sof Tarjima Fenomenining Semantik Va Pragmatik Xususiyatlari Hamda Ma’naviy Ahamiyati

Authors

  • Nargiza Tuxtaxodjayeva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57033/Peshqadam_Karvoni-2026/1/5

Keywords:

pure translation, semantics, pragmatics, context, spirituality, intercultural communication

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of “pure translation,” understood as an attempt to recreate meaning and authorial style without arbitrary additions, while maintaining a balanced relation between form and content. Pure translation is treated not as mere information transfer but as the reconstruction of layered meaning, connotation, stylistic coloring, and context-sensitive semantic dynamics. The paper systematizes key semantic dimensions (denotation, connotation, imagery, metaphor) and pragmatic parameters (communicative goal, audience design, speech acts, implicature). It also argues for the spiritual significance of translation as a bridge between cultures, a channel for ethical-aesthetic values, and a factor that enriches national identity and cultural memory. The interpretation of theconcept of pure translation within the context of national translation studies is revealed through the analysis of the scientific heritage of distinguished Uzbek scholars Ghaybulla Salomov and Zuhriddin Isomiddinov.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdisharipova, M., Nurmetov, Sh. 2025. “Tarjima jarayonida madaniyatlararo tafakkur. IQRO jurnali, 16(01), 53-54.

Baker, M. 2018. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315619187/words-mona-baker DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619187

Bennett, K. 2021. «The Ethical Dimensions of Fidelity in Translation.» In: Translation Ethics. London: Routledge.

Eco, U. 2003. Dire quasi la stessa cosa. Milano: Bompiani.

Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In: Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.: https://thegricean.github.io/xprag-ling247/ readings/grice1975.pdf.

Hatim, B., Mason, I. 1990. Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.

House, J. 1997. Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Tübingen: Narr.https://books.google.com/books/about/Translation_Quality_Assessment. html?id=D16aYuTCBJ0C.

Isomiddinov, Z. 1998. «Dil ko‘prigi.» // Jahon adabiyoti jurnali, 1998-yil, 3-son.

Isomiddinov, Z. 1999. «O‘zbekning birinchi kalomi.» // Jahon adabiyoti jurnali, 1999-yil, 6-son.

Jakobson, R. 1959. «On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.» In: On Translation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Jepri, J. 2025. «From Equivalence to Function: Pragmatic Approaches to Faithful Translation.» Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya, 9(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v9i3.21586

Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Newmark, P. 1988. A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall. https:// openlibrary.org/books/OL2736178M/A_textbook_of_translation

Nida, E. A. 1964. Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004495746

Odilova, G. 2024. «Badiiy tarjimada poetik lug‘atlarning o‘rni.» // Tarjima san’ati jurnali, 2024-yil, 1-son, 45-52-betlar.

Salomov, G‘. 1966. Til va tarjima. Toshkent: Fan.

Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

Venuti, L. 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-22

Issue

Section

Republican Scientific-Practical Conference “The Role of the Works of Shaykh Muhammad Sodiq Muhammad Yusuf in Introducing Youth to Pure Islamic Enlightenment and Protecting Them from Alien Ideas” (Peshqadam Karvoni, 2026)

How to Cite

Sof Tarjima Fenomenining Semantik Va Pragmatik Xususiyatlari Hamda Ma’naviy Ahamiyati. (2026). The Journal of Interdisciplinary Human Studies, 2(Conference Issue), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.57033/Peshqadam_Karvoni-2026/1/5