The Impact Of Innovation Potential On The Competitiveness Of National Economies: A Comparative Economic-Empirical Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-9-0271Keywords:
innovation potential, national competitiveness, Global Innovation Index, R&D intensity, labour productivity, innovation efficiency, resource rents, Uzbekistan, cross-country analysis. 577 www.mijournals.com E-ISSN 3069-8375 Vol. 2, (Issue 9/2026)Abstract
This article examines the extent to which national innovation potential explains cross-country differences in economic competitiveness. Innovation potential is measured by the Global Innovation Index (GII) 2025 score, competitiveness is proxied by labour productivity in the Porterian sense (GDP per capita at purchasing power parity), and research intensity is captured by gross domestic expenditure on R&D as a share of GDP. A cross-section of 98 economies (69 with R&D data) is analysed by means of correlation analysis, ordinary least squares estimation with heteroscedasticity- consistent standard errors, quadratic and split-sample specifications, and a residual- based measure of innovation efficiency. Innovation potential and competitiveness are strongly and positively associated (r = 0.714; ρ = 0.750): a ten-point increase in the GII score corresponds to approximately 55 per cent higher output per capita. When innovation potential and R&D intensity are entered jointly, only the systemic indicator remains statistically significant, which suggests that research spending translates into competitiveness only through the institutional and absorptive capacity that surrounds it. The relationship is concave, and its marginal payoff is roughly twice as large below the sample median as above it, indicating that catch-up economies gain most from incremental improvements in innovation capability. Residual analysis identifies a systematic decoupling of income from capability in resource-rentier economies and confirms Uzbekistan’s status as a modest over-performer despite the lowest research intensity in its peer group.Downloads
References
1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2006). Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(1), 37–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2006.4.1.37
2. Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553053970214
728.
3. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
4. Castellacci, F. (2008). Innovation and the competitiveness of industries: Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 984–1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.09.002
5. Cirera, X., & Maloney, W. F. (2017). The innovation paradox: Developing-country capabilities and the unrealized promise of technological catch-up. World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1160-9
6. Coe, D. T., & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, 39(5), 859–887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(94)00100-E
7. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-158. (2023). “O‘zbekiston – 2030” strategiyasi to‘g‘risida [On the “Uzbekistan – 2030” Strategy]. Lex.uz.
8. Delgado, M., Ketels, C., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2012). The determinants of national competitiveness (NBER Working Paper No. 18249). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w18249
9. Fagerberg, J. (1988). International competitiveness. The Economic Journal, 98(391), 355–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2233372
10. Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417–1435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003
11. Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., & Knell, M. (2007). The competitiveness of nations: Why some countries prosper while others fall behind. World Development, 35(10), 1595–1620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.01.004
12. Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., & Verspagen, B. (2010). Innovation and economic development. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 833–872). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02004-6
13. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter.
14. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. 591 E-ISSN 3069-8375 Vol. 2, (Issue 9/2026) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4
15. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321
16. Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1033–1082). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02008-3
17. Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4
18. IMD. (2025). IMD World Competitiveness Ranking 2025. IMD World Competitiveness Center.
19. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 28–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20045917
20. Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: An economic evaluation of the Global Competitiveness Report. World Development, 29(9), 1501–1525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00051-1
21. Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474549
22. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter.
23. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
24. Özçelik, E., & Taymaz, E. (2004). Does innovativeness matter for international competitiveness in developing countries? The case of Turkish manufacturing industries. Research Policy, 33(3), 409–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.011
25. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
26. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
27. Shermukhamedov, K. A. (2014). Ideology of tolerance in Islam. Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defences of peace must be constructed, 159.
28. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth (NBER Working Paper No. 5398). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w5398
29. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
30. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
31. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
32. Ulku, H. (2004). R&D, innovation, and economic growth: An empirical analysis (IMF Working Paper No. 04/185). International Monetary Fund. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451859447.001
33. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (n.d.). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) [Data set]. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
34. WIPO. (2025). Global Innovation Index 2025: Innovation in a shifting global landscape. World Intellectual Property Organization.
35. World Bank. (2025). World development indicators: GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2021 international $) [Data set]. World Bank. 592 E-ISSN 3069-8375
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarvarbek ALLAYEV (##default.groups.name.author##)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access License and Copyright Terms
All articles published in The Journal of Interdisciplinary Human Studies are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation of the work in any medium or format, provided that the original author(s) and the source are properly credited.
Authors retain full copyright to their published work and grant the journal the right of first publication.
✅ Official license URL:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
