THE CREEDAL VIEWS OF PSEUDO-SALAFISM AND THEIR IDEOLOGICAL AFFINITY WITH HISTORICAL TASHBIH MOVEMENTS

Authors

  • Muhammad-Sоdiq SAMINОV

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-7-0152

Keywords:

pseudo-Salafism; mushabbiha; mujassima; Karramiya; tajsim; tashbih; Islamic creed; taʼwil; tafwid; Maturidism; Ashʿarism; takfir; Ibn Taymiya; Wahhabism; Uzbekistan.

Abstract

This article conducts a comparative analysis of the creedal positions advanced by contemporary pseudo-Salafi movements and their ideological affinity with the historical mushabbiha and mujassima sects of Islamic intellectual history. Despite pseudo-Salafis’ self-presentation as defenders of pure creed, the article demonstrates that their doctrinal roots lead back to the deviant sects of earlier Islamic history. Five principal areas of ideological convergence are identified: the literal interpretation of mutashabih Qurʼanic expressions; the attribution of direction and locality to Allah; the attribution of movement and change to Allah; the rejection of taʼwil combined with false attribution to the pious ancestors; and the use of takfir ideology. The article further identifies the Karramiya sect of Muhammad ibn Karram al-Sijistani (d. 255/868) as the historical movement most closely aligned with contemporary pseudo-Salafism. The study concludes that pseudo-Salafism represents not a continuation of the methodology of the genuine pious ancestors but a modern revival of the doctrinal positions of the historically deviant mushabbiha, mujassima, and Karramiya movements, and that the critiques formulated by Imam al-Maturidi and Imam Abu al-Muʿin al-Nasafi remain directly applicable to their contemporary positions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Al-Aʿyidi, S. Z. (2022). Aqidatu ahl al-sunna wa-l-jamaʿa [The creed of Ahl al-Sunna wal-Jamaʿa]. Dar al-Faruq.

2. Al-Baghdadi, A. M. (1977). Al-farq bayn al-firaq [The difference between the sects]. Dar

al-Afaq al-Jadida.

3. Al-Maturidi, A. M. (2023). Kitab al-tawhid [The book of divine unity] (A. Alloqulov, I.

Abdurahmonov, & A. Yaxshilikov, Trans.). Hilol-Nashr.

4. Al-Nasafi, A. M. (1993). Tabsirat al-adilla fi usul al-din [Illumination of the proofs in the

principles of religion]. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı.

5. Al-Shahristani, M. A. (1993). Al-milal wa-l-nihal [Religious sects and philosophical schools]

(Vol. 1). Dar al-Maʿrifa.

6. Aminov, H. (2021). Ixtilofli masalalarning yechimlari: soxta salafiylarga raddiyalar [Solutions

to contested issues: Refutations of pseudo-Salafis]. Oʼzbekiston Xalqaro Islom Akademiyasi.

7. Dahlan, A. Z. (2010). Al-durar al-saniyya fi al-radd ala al-wahhabiyya [The precious gems

in refutation of Wahhabism]. Hakikat Kitabevi.

8. Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, A. (2002). Lisan al-mizan [The tongue of the scale] (Vol. 7). Dar

al-Bashaʼir al-Islamiyya.

9. Ibn Taymiya, A. (2005). Majmuʿ al-fatawa [Collected legal opinions] (Vol. 4). Dar al-Wafaʼ.

10.Karimov, S. (2020). Oʼzbekistonda diniy ekstremizm va terrorizmga qarshi kurash [The

struggle against religious extremism and terrorism in Uzbekistan]. Akademiya.

11. Mansur, A. (2004). Qurʼoni Karim maʼnolarining tarjima va tafsiri [Translation and exegesis

of the meanings of the Holy Qurʼan]. Toshkent Islom Universiteti.

12.Mirziyoev, Sh. M. (2022). Yangi Oʼzbekiston taraqqiyot strategiyasi [The development

strategy of New Uzbekistan]. Oʼzbekiston.

13.Tojiboev, B. (2021). Salafiylarga ilmiy raddiyalar [Scholarly refutations of Salafis]. Azon

Kitoblari.

14.Zayriyev, A., & Qudratulloh, E. (2022). Soxta salafiylarning sayoz sabogʼi [The shallow

lesson of pseudo-Salafis]. Shamsuddinxon Boboxonov NMIU.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE CREEDAL VIEWS OF PSEUDO-SALAFISM AND THEIR IDEOLOGICAL AFFINITY WITH HISTORICAL TASHBIH MOVEMENTS. (2026). The Journal of Interdisciplinary Human Studies, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.57033/mijournals-2026-7-0152